Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I've been up and down stackoverflow and even the very, very nice Dr. Dobbs article but I can't find a definitive answer to the question.

A section of the answer to the question What are the shortcomings of std::reverse_iterator? says that it might not be possible at all.


std::list::reverse_iterator it = list.rbegin();

while(  it != list.rend() )
{
   int value=*it;
   if( some_cond_met_on(value) )
   {     
        ++it;
        list.erase( it.base() );
   }
   else
   {
     ++it;
   }
}

PS: I do know there are other alternatives, such as erase_if(), but I'm looking for an answer to this specific question.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
337 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

It should just be

std::list<int>::reverse_iterator it = list.rbegin();

while(  it != list.rend() )
{
   int value=*it;
   if( some_cond_met_on(value) )
   {     
        ++it;
        it= reverse_iterator(list.erase(it.base()); // change to this!
   }
   else
   {
     ++it;
   }
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...