Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

Does the C99/C++11 standard guarantee that sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(void*) is always true?

size_t f(void* p)
{
    return (size_t)(p); // Is it safe?
}

void* f(size_t n)
{
    return (void*)(n); // Is it safe?
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
605 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

No, that is not guaranteed. Use intptr_t or uintptr_t to safely store a pointer in an integer.

There are/were architectures where it makes sense for that to be false, such as the segmented DOS memory model. There the memory was structured in 64k segments - an object could never be larger than a segment, so 16-bit size_t would be enough. However, a pointer had "segment" and "offset" parts, so it would by definition have to be larger than 16 bits to be able to refer to different segments.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...