Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I just noticed over on

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/error/uncaught_exception

that C++17 will replace std::uncaught_exception(), which returns a bool, with std::uncaught_exceptions(), which returns an int.

The addition to the standard describing this is here:

http://isocpp.org/files/papers/n4259.pdf

It doesn't provide the rationale but it does say

[Note: When uncaught_exceptions() > 0, throwing an exception can result in a call of std::terminate() (15.5.1). – end note]

which is oddly vague.

What is the reason for this change? Will multiple active exceptions be possible in C++17 or some future version of the standard?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
271 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

The paper that introduced this was n4152, which has the rationale (which generally boils down to "make ScopeGuard work")

To quote,

as documented at least since 1998 in Guru of the Week #47, it means code that is transitively called from a destructor that could itself be invoked during stack unwinding cannot correctly detect whether it itself is actually being called as part of unwinding. Once you’re in unwinding of any exception, to uncaught_exception everything looks like unwinding, even if there is more than one active exception.

And

this uses information already present in major implementations, where current implementations of ScopeGuard resort to nonportable code that relies on undocumented compiler features to make ScopeGuard “portable in practice” today. This option proposes adding a single new function to expose the information that already present in compilers, so that these uses can be truly portable

PS: Here's an example of how this function can be implemented using compiler-speicific information: https://github.com/panaseleus/stack_unwinding/blob/master/boost/exception/uncaught_exception_count.hpp

And for a simple example where it's used, look no further than boost.log's "record pump" (see boost/log/detail/format.hpp and boost/log/sources/record_ostream.hpp): it makes it possible for BOOST_LOG(lg) << foo(); to log in the destructor of the guard object it creates if foo doesn't throw, that is, if the number of exceptions in flight when the destructor is called is not greater than when the constructor was called.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...