Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I have a base class and a child class extending it. The child class has its own method inside that the parent class does not have. That is, declaring it as virtual in the base class is not really an option.

class A {
  public:
    virtual void helloWorld();
};

class B : public A {
  public:
    virtual void helloWorld();
    void myNewMethod();
};

Then, in my implementation, I have a pointer to A and I constructed it as B:

// somewhere in a .cpp file
A* x;
x = new B();
x->myNewMethod(); // doesn't work

My current solution is to cast it:

((B *)x)->myNewMethod();

My question is, is there a cleaner way of doing this, or is casting the way to go?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
1.1k views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

My question is, is there a cleaner way of doing this, or is casting the way to go?

A run-time cast seems to be OK in this case. However, rather than C-style casts, you should use dynamic_cast<> (in case you are not sure whether x actually points to an object of type of B):

B* pB = dynamic_cast<B*>(x); // This will return nullptr if x does not point
                             // to an object of type B
if (pB != nullptr)
{
    pB->myNewMethod();
}

On the other hand, if you are sure that x points to an object of type B, then you should use static_cast<>:

B* pB = static_cast<B*>(x);
pB->myNewMethod();

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share

548k questions

547k answers

4 comments

86.3k users

...