Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I push_back a temporary object into a vector like this,

vector<A> vec;
vec.push_back(A("abc"));

will the compiler apply copy-elision to construct the temporary A("abc") directly into the vector, so that A's copy ctor won't be triggered when pushing the temporary object into vec.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
976 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

If you have a compiler that supports rvalue references, it will be moved into the vector, which is sometimes quite cheap.

An alternative to that is to directly construct the object in the vector, which can be done with vec.emplace_back("abc");. This only invokes one constructor.

Both of these are C++11 features. Copy elision is not allowed here, so without those features the copy will still be made.

However, if the copy constructor has no observable side-effects (which it shouldn't have anyway), a smart compiler may still perform that optimisation, because the "as-if" rule allows any optimisation that results in the same observable behaviour. I don't know if any current compiler does that, though. If not, I doubt anyone will spend the effort to add such an optimisation because rvalue references put an end to that need.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...