If you have a compiler that supports rvalue references, it will be moved into the vector, which is sometimes quite cheap.
An alternative to that is to directly construct the object in the vector, which can be done with vec.emplace_back("abc");
. This only invokes one constructor.
Both of these are C++11 features. Copy elision is not allowed here, so without those features the copy will still be made.
However, if the copy constructor has no observable side-effects (which it shouldn't have anyway), a smart compiler may still perform that optimisation, because the "as-if" rule allows any optimisation that results in the same observable behaviour. I don't know if any current compiler does that, though. If not, I doubt anyone will spend the effort to add such an optimisation because rvalue references put an end to that need.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…