Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

Is there any logical reason that will explain why in ternary optor both branches must have the same base type or be convertible to one? What is the problem in not having this rule? Why on earth I can't do thing like this (it is not the best example, but clarifies what I mean):

int var = 0;

void left();
int right();

var ? left() : right();
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
1.2k views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Expressions must have a type known at compile time. You can't have expressions of type "either X or Y", it has to be one or the other.

Consider this case:

void f(int x) {...}
void f(const char* str) {...}

f(condition ? 5 : "Hello");

Which overload is going to be called? This is a simple case, and there are more complicated ones involving e.g. templates, which have to be known at compile time. So in the above case, the compiler won't choose an overload based on the condition, it has to pick one overload to always call.

It can't do that, so the result of a ternary operator always has to be the same type (or compatible).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...