Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

In C++11, should the operation of static_assert within a template depend on whether that template has been instantiated or not? For example, with the following code

template <int I>
void sa() { static_assert(0,"Hello."); }

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { return 0; }

GCC 4.5.0 will fail the assertion, and produce the "Hello." message. The Digital Mars Compiler version 8.42n on the other hand, gives no message.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
475 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

GCC is correct and the other compiler is correct too. Refer to 14.6p8 in the spec

If no valid specialization can be generated for a template definition, and that template is not instantiated, the template de?nition is ill-formed, no diagnostic required.

Therefor, a compiler is free to reject the following

template<typename T>
void f() {
  static_assert(0, "may trigger immediately!");
  static_assert(sizeof(T) == 0, "may trigger immediately!");
}

If you want to go safe, you have to arrange it so the compiler cannot know until instantiation whether the boolean expression will be true or false. For example, get the value by getvalue<T>::value, with getvalue being a class template (one could specialize it, so the compiler cannot possibly know the boolean value already).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...