Because in the general case, it's impossible at compile time to determine what type it will be at run time. Your example can be resolved at compile time (see answer by @Quentin), but cases can be constructed that can't, such as:
Base *bp;
if (rand() % 10 < 5)
bp = new Derived;
else
bp = new Base;
bp->show(); // only known at run time
EDIT: Thanks to @nwp, here's a much better case. Something like:
Base *bp;
char c;
std::cin >> c;
if (c == 'd')
bp = new Derived;
else
bp = new Base;
bp->show(); // only known at run time
Also, by corollary of Turing's proof, it can be shown that in the general case it's mathematically impossible for a C++ compiler to know what a base class pointer points to at run time.
Assume we have a C++ compiler-like function:
bool bp_points_to_base(const string& program_file);
That takes as its input program_file
: the name of any C++ source-code text file where a pointer bp
(as in the OP) calls its virtual
member function show()
. And can determine in the general case (at sequence point A
where the virtual
member function show()
is first invoked through bp
): whether the pointer bp
points to an instance of Base
or not.
Consider the following fragment of the C++ program "q.cpp":
Base *bp;
if (bp_points_to_base("q.cpp")) // invokes bp_points_to_base on itself
bp = new Derived;
else
bp = new Base;
bp->show(); // sequence point A
Now if bp_points_to_base
determines that in "q.cpp": bp
points to an instance of Base
at A
then "q.cpp" points bp
to something else at A
. And if it determines that in "q.cpp": bp
doesn't point to an instance of Base
at A
, then "q.cpp" points bp
to an instance of Base
at A
. This is a contradiction. So our initial assumption is incorrect. So bp_points_to_base
can't be written for the general case.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…