Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I've seen people mention that a random element can be grabbed from an unordered_set in O(1) time. I attempted to do so with this:

std::unordered_set<TestObject*> test_set;

//fill with data

size_t index = rand() % test_set.size();
const TestObject* test = *(test_set.begin() + index);

However, unordered_set iterators don't support + with an integer. begin can be given a size_t param, but it is the index of a bucket rather than an element. Randomly picking a bucket then randomly picking an element within it would result in a very unbalanced random distribution.

What's the secret to proper O(1) random access? If it matters, this is in VC++ 2010.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
636 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

I believe you have misinterpreted the meaning of "random access", as it was used in those cases you're referring to.

"Random access" doesn't have anything to do with randomness. It means to access an element "at random", i.e. access any element anywhere in the container. Accessing an element directly, such as with std::vector::operator[] is random access, but iterating over a container is not.

Compare this to RAM, which is short for "Random Access Memory".


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...