If I allocated an std::vector to a certain size and capacity using resize()
and reserve()
at the beginning of my program, is it possible that pop_back()
may "break" the reserved capacity and cause reallocations?
If I allocated an std::vector to a certain size and capacity using resize()
and reserve()
at the beginning of my program, is it possible that pop_back()
may "break" the reserved capacity and cause reallocations?
No. The only way to shrink a vector's capacity is the swap trick
template< typename T, class Allocator >
void shrink_capacity(std::vector<T,Allocator>& v)
{
std::vector<T,Allocator>(v.begin(),v.end()).swap(v);
}
and even that isn't guaranteed to work according to the standard. (Although it's hard to imagine an implementation where it wouldn't work.)
As far as I know, the next version of the C++ standard (what used to be C++0x, but now became C++1x) will have std::vector<>::shrink_to_fit()
.