Yes, you can:
enum Month
{
January,
February,
// ... snip ...
December
};
// prefix (++my_month)
Month& operator++(Month& orig)
{
orig = static_cast<Month>(orig + 1); // static_cast required because enum + int -> int
//!!!!!!!!!!!
// TODO : See rest of answer below
//!!!!!!!!!!!
return orig;
}
// postfix (my_month++)
Month operator++(Month& orig, int)
{
Month rVal = orig;
++orig;
return rVal;
}
However, you have to make a decision about how to handle "overflowing" your enum. If my_month is equal to December, and you execute the statement ++my_month
, my_month will still become numerically equivalent to December + 1 and have no corresponding named value in the enum. If you choose to allow this you have to assume that instances of the enum could be out of bounds. If you choose to check for orig == December
before you increment it, you can wrap the value back to January and eliminate this concern. Then, however, you've lost the information that you've rolled-over into a new year.
The implementation (or lack thereof) of the TODO section is going to depend heavily on your individual use case.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…