Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I'm working with a particle simulation library. The way interactions are added to particles it through the following library function:

AddInteraction(ParticleSet particleSet, void(*interaction)(xyz* p, xyz* v))

I now want to pass a member function to AddInteraction. I've understood that this is impossible to do without changing the library function. Changing the library is something I'd like to avoid, but if the change is small I can mail the author of the library and ask for it to be implemented.

I want to write a simple example of how it can be done. Different solutions are possible:

  • Lambda expressions. These would be perfect, however the library uses CUDA and NVCC, which don't support Lamda expressions yet.

  • Functors. I thought functors could do the job. However, I haven't managed to get them working in the way I want. For example, I can't get a list of functors to work. This problem is described in http://www.tutok.sk/fastgl/callback.html under Parameterize the Caller:

' If a component has many callback relationships it quickly becomes unworkable to parameterize them all. Consider a Button that wants to maintain a dynamic list of callees to be notified upon a click event. Since the callee type is built into the Button class type, this list must be either homogeneous or typeless.'

I have to admit that I don't understand everything that is written on that site, so there might be an answer there.

  • Using a 3d party library. For example the 'Callbacks Using Template Functors Library' as described on http://www.tutok.sk/fastgl/callback.html, or using Boost::Function. However, these will probably require major changes to the particle library I'm working with, right?

Are there any alternatives? Or is there a way to get one of the above solutions to work?

Thanks a lot!

Edit:

Thanks for your suggestions. They help, but I fail to see how they give a complete solution to my problem. Specifically, I'm trying to get this to work:

std::vector<void(*)(xyz*,xyz*)> interactionList;

void AddInteraction(void(*func)(xyz*,xyz*))
{
    interactionList.push_back(func);
}

void Simulate()
{
    for(size_t i = 0; i < interactionList.size(); i++)
    {
        interactionList[i](0,0); //Would normally be called for every particle
    }
}

class Cell {
public:
    void UpdateParticle(xyz* p, xyz* v);
    Cell()
    {
        AddInteraction(this->UpdateParticle); //Does not work
    }
};

int main()
{
    Cell cell1;
    Cell cell2;

    for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
    {
        Simulate();
    }

    return 1;
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
133 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

It is possible to make that library function call a member function without modifying the library. The technique (called thunking) is quite general and can be thought of as a sort of just-in-time (JIT) compilation. It is employed by some widely used libraries (like ATL and WTL on Windows).

Basically you want to create a copy of a function like this:

void callback(xyz* p, xyz* v) {
    YourClass *ptr = (YourClass*)0xABCDEF00; // this pointer
    ptr->member_callback(p, v);
}

for each instance of YourClass. Then you can pass it to the library as usual:

AddInteraction(particleSet, this->a_pointer_to_an_instance_of_that_function);

This approach is simple once you're familiar with machine code, but it's not portable (yet can be implemented on any reasonable architecture).

For details see the description and implementation for Windows.

EDIT: Here is how one can generate the machine code for the thunk without actually knowing assembly. Compile this code in release:

void f(int *a, int *b)
{
    X *ptr = reinterpret_cast<X*>(0xAAAAAAAA);
    void (*fp)(void*, int*, int*) = reinterpret_cast<void(*)(void*, int*, int*)>(0xBBBBBBBB);
    fp(ptr, a, b);
}

int main()
{
    void (*volatile fp)(int*, int*) = f;
    fp(0, 0);
}

Put a breakpoint in f and run. Look at the assembly code in the debugger. On my machine it looks like this:

00401000   8B 44 24 08      mov         eax,dword ptr [esp+8] 
00401004   8B 4C 24 04      mov         ecx,dword ptr [esp+4] 
00401008   50               push        eax  
00401009   51               push        ecx  
0040100A   68 AA AA AA AA   push        0AAAAAAAAh 
0040100F   BA BB BB BB BB   mov         edx,0BBBBBBBBh 
00401014   FF D2            call        edx  
00401016   83 C4 0C         add         esp,0Ch 
00401019   C3               ret 

The first column is the memory address of the code, the second is the machine code (you may need to enable it in MSVC by right clicking > show code bytes), the third is the disassembled code. What we need is the second column. You can just copy it from here or use any other method (like object file listing).

This code corresponds to a function with a default calling convention, receives two pointers (the type doesn't matter here), returns nothing, and performs a call to a function at address 0xBBBBBBBB passing 0xAAAAAAAA as the first parameter. Voilà! This is exactly how our thunk should look like!

Initialize the thunk with the machine code from above:

8B 44 24 08 8B 4C 24 04 50 51 68 AA AA AA AA BA BB BB BB BB FF 83 C4 0C C3

And replace AA AA AA AA with this address and BB BB BB BB with a pointer to the following function. To avoid endianess issues use unaligned access.

void delegate(YourClass *that, xyz p, xyz* v) {
    that->member(p, v);
}

We magically encoded that and f inside a single function pointer! And since the last call is likely to be inlined, the whole thing costs just one more function call compared to the void* approach.

? WARNING ? There are some restrictions on what you can write in f above. Any code that will compile to machine code with relative addressing will not work. But the above is just enough for accomplishing the task.

NOTE: It's possible to call the member function directly without the delegate function, as done in the CodeProject article. However, due to the complexities of what member function pointers are, I prefer to do not do this.

NOTE: The code generate by this method is suboptimal. The optimal code equivalent to the above would be:

00401026 68 AA AA AA AA   push        0AAAAAAAAh 
0040102B BA BB BB BB BB   mov         edx,0BBBBBBBBh 
00401030 FF E2            jmp         edx  

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...