Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I am not an expert, so go easy on me. Are there any differences between these two code segments?

#define BIT3 (0x1
<
<
3)
static int a;

and

#define BIT3 (0x1 << 3) static int a;

Also, is there a way to write the first in one line? What is the point of this multi-line style? Is the following code good?

#define BIT3 (0x1 << 3)
static int a;
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
347 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

A multi-line macro is useful if you have a very complex macro which would be difficult to read if it were all on one line (although it's inadvisable to have very complex macros).

In general, you can write a multi-line define using the line-continuation character, . So e.g.

#define MY_MACRO    printf( 
    "I like %d types of cheese
", 
    5 
    )

But you cannot do that with your first example. You cannot split tokens like that; the << left-shift operator must always be written without any separating whitespace, otherwise it would be interpreted as two less-than operators. So maybe:

#define BIT3 (0x1 
    << 
    3) 
    static int a;

which is now equivalent to your second example.

[Although I'm not sure how that macro would ever be useful!]


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share

548k questions

547k answers

4 comments

86.3k users

...