Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

Consider the following code snippet:

#include <vector>
using namespace std;

void sub(vector<int>& vec) {
    vec.push_back(5);
}

int main() {
    vector<int> vec(4,0);
    sub(vec);
    return 0;
}

Assuming "vec" has no space left to store the 5 in the "sub" function, where does it allocate new memory?

In the stack frame of the sub function? In that case the 5 would be deleted at the end of the sub function. But the stack frame of the main function can't grow, as the stack frame of the sub function lies on top of the stack at that moment.
Does a std::vector allocate memory for its elements on the heap? But how does it free that heap memory? If it's a local vector on the stack, the stack frame of a function including the vector is deleted in the end without signaling the vector that it will be deleted?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
377 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Does a std::vector allocate memory for its elements on the heap?

Yes. Or more accurately it allocates based on the allocator you pass in at construction. You didn't specify one, so you get the default allocator. By default, this will be the heap.

But how does it free that heap memory?

Through its destructor when it goes out of scope. (Note that a pointer to a vector going out of scope won't trigger the destructor). But if you had passed by value to sub you'd construct (and later destruct) a new copy. 5 would then get pushed back onto that copy, the copy would be cleaned up, and the vector in main would be untouched.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...