Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

While working on this question, I noticed that GCC (v4.7)'s implementation of std::function moves its arguments when they are taken by value. The following code shows this behavior:

#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

struct CopyableMovable
{
    CopyableMovable()                        { std::cout << "default" << '
'; }
    CopyableMovable(CopyableMovable const &) { std::cout << "copy" << '
'; }
    CopyableMovable(CopyableMovable &&)      { std::cout << "move" << '
'; }
};

void foo(CopyableMovable cm)
{ }

int main()
{
    typedef std::function<void(CopyableMovable)> byValue;

    byValue fooByValue = foo;

    CopyableMovable cm;
    fooByValue(cm);
}
// outputs: default copy move move

We see here that a copy of cm is performed (which seems reasonable since the byValue's parameter is taken by value), but then there are two moves. Since function is operating on a copy of cm, the fact that it moves its argument can be seen as an unimportant implementation detail. However, this behavior causes some trouble when using function together with bind:

#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

struct MoveTracker
{
    bool hasBeenMovedFrom;

    MoveTracker()
      : hasBeenMovedFrom(false)
    {}
    MoveTracker(MoveTracker const &)
      : hasBeenMovedFrom(false)
    {}
    MoveTracker(MoveTracker && other)
      : hasBeenMovedFrom(false)
    {
        if (other.hasBeenMovedFrom)
        {
            std::cout << "already moved!" << '
';
        }
        else
        {
            other.hasBeenMovedFrom = true;
        }
    }
};

void foo(MoveTracker, MoveTracker) {}

int main()
{
    using namespace std::placeholders;
    std::function<void(MoveTracker)> func = std::bind(foo, _1, _1);
    MoveTracker obj;
    func(obj); // prints "already moved!"
}

Is this behavior allowed by the standard? Is std::function allowed to move its arguments? And if so, is it normal that we can convert the wrapper returned by bind into a std::function with by-value parameters, even though this triggers unexpected behavior when dealing with multiple occurrences of placeholders?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
143 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

std::function is specified to pass the supplied arguments to the wrapped function with std::forward. e.g. for std::function<void(MoveTracker)>, the function call operator is equivalent to

void operator(CopyableMovable a)
{
    f(std::forward<CopyableMovable>(a));
}

Since std::forward<T> is equivalent to std::move when T is not a reference type, this accounts for one of the moves in your first example. It's possible that the second comes from having to go through the indirection layers inside std::function.

This then also accounts for the problem you are encountering with using std::bind as the wrapped function: std::bind is also specified to forward its parameters, and in this case it is being passed an rvalue reference resulting from the std::forward call inside std::function. The function call operator of your bind expression is thus forwarding an rvalue reference to each of the arguments. Unfortunately, since you've reused the placeholder, it's an rvalue reference to the same object in both cases, so for movable types whichever is constructed first will move the value, and the second parameter will get an empty shell.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...