Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I have a ConcurrentHashMap where I do the following:

sequences = new ConcurrentHashMap<Class<?>, AtomicLong>();

if(!sequences.containsKey(table)) {
    synchronized (sequences) {
        if(!sequences.containsKey(table))
            initializeHashMapKeyValue(table);
    }
}

My question is - is it unnecessary to make the extra

if(!sequences.containsKey(table))

Check inside the synschronized block so other threads wont initialize the same hashmap value?

Maybe the check is necessary and I am doing it wrong? It seems a bit silly what I'm doing, but I think it is necessary.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
283 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

All operations on a ConcurrentHashMap are thread-safe, but thread-safe operations are not composable. You trying to make atomic a pair of operations: checking for something in the map and, in case it's not there, put something there (I assume). So the answer to your questions is yes, you need to check again, and your code looks ok.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...