Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

Take this for example (excerpt from Java regex checker not working):

while(!checker) {
    matcher = pattern.matcher(number);
    if(matcher.find())
        checker = true;
    else
        year++;
}

Would it matter if .equals(false) was used to check for the value of the Boolean checker?

I know that there is this which is rather similar. However, obviously the question deals with primitive boolean and not the object wrapper, Boolean; thus, .equals() would not be applicable.

Also, should Boolean be dealt differently than boolean?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
304 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Try this:

if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(yourValue)) { ... }

As additional benefit this is null-safe.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...