Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I was writing a program and facing this problem that the following function used to return garbage values:

int* foo(int temp){
   int x = temp;
   return &x;
}

When I modified it to this, it worked fine:

int* foo(int *temp){
    int *x = temp;
    return x
}

What was wrong with the first version?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
1.5k views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

The first version returns a reference to a local variable x whose storage is limited to the function foo. When the function exits, x can no longer be used. Returning a reference to it is one instance of a dangling pointer.

In the second version, you're really only passing in and returning the same pointer value, which refers to memory which isn't limited by the lifetime of the function. So even after the function exits, the returned address is still valid.

Another alternative:

int *foo(int temp)
{
    int *x = malloc(sizeof(int));
    *x = temp;
    return x;
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share

548k questions

547k answers

4 comments

86.3k users

...