Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I have built my state like so

const list = {
  categories: {
   Professional: {
    active: false,
    names: [
      {
        id: 1,
        name: "Golf",
        active: false
      },
      {
        id: 2,
        name: "Ultimate Frisbee",
        active: false
      }
  ] 
}}

In my action I have added an ID option so I would like to change the active status when the user clicks the option to do so

I am using Immutable JS though not married to it. I am wondering how I could target the id of the object and update its active status in a reducer? I am also open to feedback on how to better improve my state

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40096036/how-to-update-a-value-of-a-nested-object-in-a-reducer

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
658 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

This is very common thing, and, actually, quite daunting. As far as I know, there is no really good and well-adopted solution in plain JS. Initially, Object.assign approach was used:

return Object.assign({}, state, {
  categories: Object.assign({}, state.categories, {
    Professional: Object.assign({}, state.Professional, {
      active: true
    })
  })
});

This is too straightforward and cumbersome, I admit it, but I have to say that we've built few big applications with this approaches, and except for number of characters it is not bad. Nowadays, the most popular approach is using Object spread:

return {
  ...state,
  categories: {
    ...state.categories,
    Professional: {
      ...state.categories.Professional,
      active: true
    }
  }
}

The second approach is much more cleaner, so if you use plain JS, then it seems as a good choice. In Immutable.js I have to admit it is easier, you just do the next

return state.updateIn(['categories', 'Professional'], x => x.set('active', true));

But it has it's own drawbacks and caveats, so it is better to think about it seriously before committing to it.

And your last question regarding improving the state – usually it is better not to have such deep nesting (separate your concerns, very often fields don't depend on each other – like active status can be separated to another object), but it is hard to say because of no knowledge of your domain. Also, it is considered as normal thing to normalize your data.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...